Recently, the Associated Press (AP), being so concerned that support for manmade global warming (MGW) is waning; they actually went to statisticians to “rework” the temperature data. According to the AP, the Internet (and probably those early, freak snowstorms this fall) is causing many to fall from the MGW faith. No doubt, the snowstorms were manmade caused by the constant snow job of arrogant alarmists.
In the AP analysis, the 1°F drop measured in 2007 by four meteorological agencies including NOAA was only 0.1°F. Not only did they undo that big dip, they discovered that 2005 was warmer than 1998, previously the alarmists’ banner hottest year. Apparently, the AP is so climatically clever that they never felt the need to verify their “anal-ysis” with even one scientist.
For how the AP’s statisticians crunched the data, their article didn’t exactly specify. But they had the audacity to accuse MGW deniers of cherry picking, a technique used often by alarmists to produce their fear mongering result. Since the AP didn’t release their method, then it’s probably “Climate Rectally-oriented Alarmist Propaganda” or in one word C.R.A.P.
And, while the AP demonstrates that it’s superb at junk journalism, their real talent lies in fantastic fudging. Perhaps, NASA’s Head Honcho Hoaxer, Jim Hansen, should employ their skills. Recently, he got caught manipulating temperature statistics to get his “October 2008 hottest on record” result. But, busybody bloggers quickly bared his bumbling where he merely copied Russia’s September temperature data verbatim to October’s.
But the grand prize for the “Charlatanry of the Century” goes to (drum roll please) Professor Phil Jones, the head of the Climate Research Unit (CRU), and Professor Michael E. Mann at Pennsylvania State University. Recently, a hacker released their private e-mails and posted them on the Internet. This bombshell has exploded into what many have dubbed “Climategate.”
So, what’s the big deal? Jones and Mann were instrumental in perpetuating the MGW hoax. First, in their e-mails they admit to using tricks to not only hide cooling, but also misusing paleoclimatology, the scientific reconstruction of climate history. By claiming that past temperature variations were lower, they assert that only man can be causing the temperature increases of today.
A flimsy argument at best, but these hoaxers were downplaying past climate like the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), which may in fact have been warmer than today. The MWP was when the Viking settled Greenland. In 2003, Mann wrote, “It would be nice to try to ‘contain’ the putative ‘MWP,’ even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back.”
Mann was instrumental is created the infamous hockey stick graph. Using tree rings, a proxy for temperature data, Mann eliminated not only the MWP, but also the Little Ice Age where the Vikings abandoned Greenland and London’s river, the Thymes, froze regularly during summer. Gotcha, actually twas winter it was.
Mann managed to create a temperature plot that showed nice, small variations before 1900, then a dramatic up tick starting in the 20th century. Now here’s where cherry picking is transformed into art form. Apparently, he whittled down the tree rings to just three. Out of thousands, that’s all that conformed to his hokey hockey stick.
However, tree rings are a poor temperature proxy because they don’t even match today’s climate. Still, Mann and Jones did every thing they could to avoid releasing their data even deleting it as well as not having their worthless work peer reviewed. For scientists, peer review is the mother’s milk of prominence and respectability.
In one e-mail, Jones wrote Mann concerning revealing data, “If they ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the UK, I think I’ll delete the file rather than send to anyone” and, “We also have a data protection act, which I will hide behind.” When a scientist is afraid of freedom of information, he’s probably peddling fraud.
Jones then urged Mann to delete e-mails. One was about the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) controversial assessment report. Jones wrote, “Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re [the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report]?” Finally, Jones was right about something because these e-mails were eventually hacked.
Another CRU professor, Tim Osborn, discussed in e-mails how manipulating data can hide a cooling trend. Mann responded that these results should never be shown because why it’ll only support critics of MGW. And on several occasions these hoaxers discussed methods on preventing skeptical papers from being published.
So, what’s been the reaction of AP since Climategate’s revelation? Publish more in favor of MGW, of course. AP just released (Nov. 22) “Warming’s impacts sped up, worsened since Kyoto” complete with photo of a cute polar bear. Undoubtedly, the alarmists will persist in their “Keep Hoax Alive.”
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
ChristCare for Christmas?
The congress has finally gone and done it. They passed the most unconstitutional bill in American history, PelosiCare or was that ObamaCare. Maybe, it should be SorrosCare or just “You’ll Be Sore Care.” Whatever it is, the Queen of Sheba, a.k.a. Squeaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, hopes it will become law by year’s end, and she already calling it America’s Christmas gift. Well, America would be better off with a lump of coal.
One of the features of this “gift” is that it requires every American to buy health insurance. When asked about her “un-constitution-atrocity” mandate, the Squeaker twice squeaked, “Are you serious?” Yes, the question is even if the one questioned isn’t. Pro-regressive Pelosi has apparently perverted the constitutional phrase “Promote the General Welfare” to its maximum perversion.
And the bill doesn’t just stipulate that failure to comply is to pay a penalty to the IRS. No, it has a fine of up to $250000 but also jail up to 5 years. Now, pro-regressives complain that prisons are already overcrowded. One of their ridiculous claims is that legalizing marijuana would practical empty all the jails.
Hey, but don’t worry. They’ll let out enough murderers, rapists and, of course, all the Islamofascist terrorists they somehow manage to convict to make room for all those tea party people who just can’t accept Pelosi’s present. Just think of it as a free vacation package to Club Fed, complete with room, board and a big, hunk of a bunk mate named Bubba.
However, if what Pelosi passed is so good, it’s a wonder she needs to push the prison angle at all. According to her and her cohorts, the dirty 220, they passed an enchanted healthcare bill. It will create an angelic apparatus, that’ll cure merely by faith sort of like the miracles performed by Jesus Christ. Just touch that government issued plastic card like Christ’s cloak and your faith in it will heal you, yes virtual ChristCare just 2000 years after the fact.
However, Jesus never had to threaten incarceration to heal people. Instead, Jesus opened the prison door and said, “The truth will set you free.” All one had to do is get up and leave. PelosiCare, on the other hand, not only threatens to put you in jail, but it also has little chance of healing you as well.
While Jesus never accepted any money for His healing services, Pelosi claims that her healthcare not only will save lives but loads of money over the long run. Yes, ChristCare cost nothing, but PelosiCare saves. Yet, government has never created a program that has ever saved money in its entire existence. That would be a miracle beyond even what Jesus could do.
Also, it’ll be a miracle if this healthcare plan doesn’t lead to what socialized medicine always results in: rationing. With the change in mammogram guidelines from 40 years old to 50, some claim that’s an example of government rationing albeit a recommendation today but a ironclad policy under PelosiCare, which will only increase the require age as time passes. However, PelosiCare will eventually offer unlimited mammograms. With only one stipulation, a person will have to be dead.
But, Jesus never rationed his miracles. He seemed to have no limit whether it was water into wine or loaves for lots of people like 5000. With ChristCare a person could even be deceased, for three days, and still be resuscitated.
Jesus brought back from the great beyond like brand-new and most importantly revived leaving no Democrat voting pattern so often observed in the dead. Lazarus never voted Democrat for the remainder of his life. It’s only mere coincidence that there weren’t any Democrats back then.
Conversely, PelosiCare would force everyone to be a Democrat because anyone who wasn’t would somehow be denied care except, of course, assisted suicide, which could be considered just ChristCare in reverse. Democrats would scoff at such a suggestion, but they under Obama have already acted in a partisan manner closing car dealerships that were mostly Republican except one that supported Hillary Clinton.
And, Democrats act like that passing this debt laden loser will cement their grip on power. Some believe because it will be superior to what America has now even though it won’t go into effect until 2013. Unlike ChristCare, nobody had to wait when Jesus was around. His care and cure were immediate.
But, Pelosi has reportedly said she’s willing to squander her squeaker-ship to pass her blessed plan. In other words, she’s willing to sacrifice many so-called moderate Democrats. Wonder if the blue dogs know that. Anyway, if it’s going to be so great, why wait so long to implement? And why would voters go against the wonderful Democrats who blessed America with this PelosiCare utterly un-ChristCare like gift.
One of the features of this “gift” is that it requires every American to buy health insurance. When asked about her “un-constitution-atrocity” mandate, the Squeaker twice squeaked, “Are you serious?” Yes, the question is even if the one questioned isn’t. Pro-regressive Pelosi has apparently perverted the constitutional phrase “Promote the General Welfare” to its maximum perversion.
And the bill doesn’t just stipulate that failure to comply is to pay a penalty to the IRS. No, it has a fine of up to $250000 but also jail up to 5 years. Now, pro-regressives complain that prisons are already overcrowded. One of their ridiculous claims is that legalizing marijuana would practical empty all the jails.
Hey, but don’t worry. They’ll let out enough murderers, rapists and, of course, all the Islamofascist terrorists they somehow manage to convict to make room for all those tea party people who just can’t accept Pelosi’s present. Just think of it as a free vacation package to Club Fed, complete with room, board and a big, hunk of a bunk mate named Bubba.
However, if what Pelosi passed is so good, it’s a wonder she needs to push the prison angle at all. According to her and her cohorts, the dirty 220, they passed an enchanted healthcare bill. It will create an angelic apparatus, that’ll cure merely by faith sort of like the miracles performed by Jesus Christ. Just touch that government issued plastic card like Christ’s cloak and your faith in it will heal you, yes virtual ChristCare just 2000 years after the fact.
However, Jesus never had to threaten incarceration to heal people. Instead, Jesus opened the prison door and said, “The truth will set you free.” All one had to do is get up and leave. PelosiCare, on the other hand, not only threatens to put you in jail, but it also has little chance of healing you as well.
While Jesus never accepted any money for His healing services, Pelosi claims that her healthcare not only will save lives but loads of money over the long run. Yes, ChristCare cost nothing, but PelosiCare saves. Yet, government has never created a program that has ever saved money in its entire existence. That would be a miracle beyond even what Jesus could do.
Also, it’ll be a miracle if this healthcare plan doesn’t lead to what socialized medicine always results in: rationing. With the change in mammogram guidelines from 40 years old to 50, some claim that’s an example of government rationing albeit a recommendation today but a ironclad policy under PelosiCare, which will only increase the require age as time passes. However, PelosiCare will eventually offer unlimited mammograms. With only one stipulation, a person will have to be dead.
But, Jesus never rationed his miracles. He seemed to have no limit whether it was water into wine or loaves for lots of people like 5000. With ChristCare a person could even be deceased, for three days, and still be resuscitated.
Jesus brought back from the great beyond like brand-new and most importantly revived leaving no Democrat voting pattern so often observed in the dead. Lazarus never voted Democrat for the remainder of his life. It’s only mere coincidence that there weren’t any Democrats back then.
Conversely, PelosiCare would force everyone to be a Democrat because anyone who wasn’t would somehow be denied care except, of course, assisted suicide, which could be considered just ChristCare in reverse. Democrats would scoff at such a suggestion, but they under Obama have already acted in a partisan manner closing car dealerships that were mostly Republican except one that supported Hillary Clinton.
And, Democrats act like that passing this debt laden loser will cement their grip on power. Some believe because it will be superior to what America has now even though it won’t go into effect until 2013. Unlike ChristCare, nobody had to wait when Jesus was around. His care and cure were immediate.
But, Pelosi has reportedly said she’s willing to squander her squeaker-ship to pass her blessed plan. In other words, she’s willing to sacrifice many so-called moderate Democrats. Wonder if the blue dogs know that. Anyway, if it’s going to be so great, why wait so long to implement? And why would voters go against the wonderful Democrats who blessed America with this PelosiCare utterly un-ChristCare like gift.
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
The Day Diversity (Should Have) Died
On November 5th an "Islamofascist" terrorist attack was perpetrated on unarmed soldiers at Fort Hood, TX. There, the truth was expressed. Many find it difficult to say a Muslim extremist, who was as overt as he could be with his radical beliefs, was simply ignored by those who should have done something. Yet, because of political correctness (PC), they did nothing. So, 13 soldiers, 14 counting an unborn baby, are dead who would have probably been alive had PC died instead.
But in this age of PC, many segments of society had an almost comical reaction to this atrocity. In the sycophant media, Chris Matthews, MSNBC Hardball, should actually be called “Oddball” after its host, wondered whether Nidal Hasan contacting Al Queda should be considered dangerous. At one point, Matthews emphatically questioned, “It’s not a crime to contact Al Queda, is it?”
Bob Shaffer, CBS Morning News, speculated, “It’s looking more and more like he [Hasan] was sort of a religious nut. Islam doesn’t have a majority [of religious nuts]. The Christian religion has its full helping of nuts, too.” Note, this quote of Shaffer’s isn’t exactly what he uttered. Removed are all the repeating of words, “er’s” and “you know’s” that every high paid professional pundit puts in his pontifications.
Now to the idiocy of what Shaffer actually said. First, Hasan isn’t just a religious nut. He’s a deliberate terrorist just like the ones who perpetrated 9/11. Not only did Hasan allegedly yell “Allahu Akbar” before commencing his slaughter fest, but he also had on his medical business card the letters SOA, which means “Soldiers of Allah.” Apparently, every aspiring jihadi has this on his stationary.
He even gave a PowerPoint presentation at an environmental health seminar just a year ago titled, “Why the War on Terror Is a War on Islam.” Okay, many liberals i.e. pro-regressives believe exactly the same. But, Hasan argued that Muslims should “stand up and fight the aggressor,” and he didn’t mean Al Queda or the Taliban. Instead he meant America. Okay, many liberals believe exactly the same.
But back to Shaffer for a moment, it’s his reference to all those jihadi Christians, yeah the ones that fly airplanes into abortion clinics, that’s most offensive. Actually, one guy kills an abortion doctor and the media treats it like the messiah’s been murdered. It’s interesting that Christianity get tarred whenever one Christian acts out of line, but when a Muslim kills, liberals worry profusely that Christians will act out of line.
When it comes to the radically religious, Islam has an estimated 10% that can go jihad with 1.5 billion Muslims worldwide that’s easily over 100 million potential Hasans. But, the sycophant media isn’t worried about them. Instead, they worry about Christians going jihad.
Newsweek Editor, Evan Thomas, cringes that Hasan is a Muslim because it just inflames all those fears. What fears? Did murderous riots by Christians become common place after the Fort Hood massacre? After 9/11?
And when a Muslim murders en masse, he’s reflexively forgiven. Also, it’s non-Muslims that are at fault. CBS Anchor John Roberts has supposedly heard stories that when a Muslim joins the military he’s harassed, pressured and made to feel un-welcomed.
Supposedly, Hasan’s car was keyed. Many non-Muslims have enjoyed this unsolicited car art, but there’s no Koranic verse commanding Muslims, “Allah say-eth that if car be marked ill, then okay infidels to kill.” Yet, Hasan did suffer severe discrimination. Why, the army promoted him to major even after he reportedly was proselytizing to patients, a big no-no for any other denominational mental health professional.
While Hasan never served in any war, some still argue that he has Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), a form that’s “pre.” Maybe, PTSD is contagious, and Hasan caught it from his non-Muslim war weary patients. Another curse of the infidels! It certainly wouldn’t be that he sympathized with the terrorists and professed often how he worried being deployed.
Speaking of vexation, most worrisome was the reaction of those in power. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) said that the 3500 Muslims in the military serve proudly. Really, how does he know this? Shouldn’t they be investigated to determine their true allegiance?
If America declared war on Canada (don’t laugh Obama is still president), it’d only make sense to review all soldiers of Canadian descent to discover those that might have a problem fighting in their native land.
Finally, the scariest quote of them all was from General Casey who worried that a greater tragedy than the Fort Hood deaths would be the loss of diversity. Well, what about diversity of thought? Not every Muslim will commit an atrocity, but not every Muslim won’t. General Casey, be open-minded enough to find out, “How many potential Hasans could there be.”
But in this age of PC, many segments of society had an almost comical reaction to this atrocity. In the sycophant media, Chris Matthews, MSNBC Hardball, should actually be called “Oddball” after its host, wondered whether Nidal Hasan contacting Al Queda should be considered dangerous. At one point, Matthews emphatically questioned, “It’s not a crime to contact Al Queda, is it?”
Bob Shaffer, CBS Morning News, speculated, “It’s looking more and more like he [Hasan] was sort of a religious nut. Islam doesn’t have a majority [of religious nuts]. The Christian religion has its full helping of nuts, too.” Note, this quote of Shaffer’s isn’t exactly what he uttered. Removed are all the repeating of words, “er’s” and “you know’s” that every high paid professional pundit puts in his pontifications.
Now to the idiocy of what Shaffer actually said. First, Hasan isn’t just a religious nut. He’s a deliberate terrorist just like the ones who perpetrated 9/11. Not only did Hasan allegedly yell “Allahu Akbar” before commencing his slaughter fest, but he also had on his medical business card the letters SOA, which means “Soldiers of Allah.” Apparently, every aspiring jihadi has this on his stationary.
He even gave a PowerPoint presentation at an environmental health seminar just a year ago titled, “Why the War on Terror Is a War on Islam.” Okay, many liberals i.e. pro-regressives believe exactly the same. But, Hasan argued that Muslims should “stand up and fight the aggressor,” and he didn’t mean Al Queda or the Taliban. Instead he meant America. Okay, many liberals believe exactly the same.
But back to Shaffer for a moment, it’s his reference to all those jihadi Christians, yeah the ones that fly airplanes into abortion clinics, that’s most offensive. Actually, one guy kills an abortion doctor and the media treats it like the messiah’s been murdered. It’s interesting that Christianity get tarred whenever one Christian acts out of line, but when a Muslim kills, liberals worry profusely that Christians will act out of line.
When it comes to the radically religious, Islam has an estimated 10% that can go jihad with 1.5 billion Muslims worldwide that’s easily over 100 million potential Hasans. But, the sycophant media isn’t worried about them. Instead, they worry about Christians going jihad.
Newsweek Editor, Evan Thomas, cringes that Hasan is a Muslim because it just inflames all those fears. What fears? Did murderous riots by Christians become common place after the Fort Hood massacre? After 9/11?
And when a Muslim murders en masse, he’s reflexively forgiven. Also, it’s non-Muslims that are at fault. CBS Anchor John Roberts has supposedly heard stories that when a Muslim joins the military he’s harassed, pressured and made to feel un-welcomed.
Supposedly, Hasan’s car was keyed. Many non-Muslims have enjoyed this unsolicited car art, but there’s no Koranic verse commanding Muslims, “Allah say-eth that if car be marked ill, then okay infidels to kill.” Yet, Hasan did suffer severe discrimination. Why, the army promoted him to major even after he reportedly was proselytizing to patients, a big no-no for any other denominational mental health professional.
While Hasan never served in any war, some still argue that he has Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), a form that’s “pre.” Maybe, PTSD is contagious, and Hasan caught it from his non-Muslim war weary patients. Another curse of the infidels! It certainly wouldn’t be that he sympathized with the terrorists and professed often how he worried being deployed.
Speaking of vexation, most worrisome was the reaction of those in power. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) said that the 3500 Muslims in the military serve proudly. Really, how does he know this? Shouldn’t they be investigated to determine their true allegiance?
If America declared war on Canada (don’t laugh Obama is still president), it’d only make sense to review all soldiers of Canadian descent to discover those that might have a problem fighting in their native land.
Finally, the scariest quote of them all was from General Casey who worried that a greater tragedy than the Fort Hood deaths would be the loss of diversity. Well, what about diversity of thought? Not every Muslim will commit an atrocity, but not every Muslim won’t. General Casey, be open-minded enough to find out, “How many potential Hasans could there be.”
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Socialism: Up Close and Very Personal
In 2007 Robert Reich gave a speech in that “pro-regressive” bastion of Berkley, CA. It was what he wanted a presidential candidate to say about healthcare if only the voters were more enlightened able like he to differentiate myth from reality. In it, he said that young people will be forced into paying into a government healthcare system. The audience applauded including students who obviously had partied too much the night before.
He also said that seniors wouldn’t get the care they might need because they were too old. Again, the audience applauded. Apparently, not many vocal codgers were in attendance. All in all, Reich gave for a pro-regressive not just an honest homily but a rather stirring speech.
Yes, inspirational not to actually agree with his idea of creating a nightmarish healthcare system that would essentially reduce every human being from a citizen to a subject. No, instead I’m inspired to write a speech of what I would want a presidential candidate to say especially to the pompous people who although rich still want to impose socialism on the rest of us…
Thank you so much for coming this afternoon. I’m so glad to see you, and I would like to be president. Let me tell you a few things about pompous people who truly peeve me because they want socialism for everyone but themselves. Although I’m a conservative through and through, I have heard the other side. Now, I agree with them, and if elected, I will diligently work to give them personally what they preach.
Michael Moore, truly I tell you. Your love affair of capitalism will end as soon as I enter the Oval Office. As president, you won’t just be wondering where your country went. You’ll also be wondering where your wealth went, dude. But, don’t worry. Your wonderful centralized government will be taking care of your money.
It’s from each according to his ability, right? We’ll be seizing all your assets. Unfortunately, your butt is another matter. Let’s face it dude, you haven’t missed a buffet since 1984, and space is especially scarce on this over populated planet. You got to slim it down, and there’s nothing like the socialist starvation diet to get you to skin and bones in no time. There’ll be no more fat farms for you, besides you won’t be able to afford them anyway.
Sean Penn, you’re so enamored with communism that you were all smiles at the 81st Academy Awards telling everyone how cool it was. Yeah, you actually cooed to the audience how they were “commie lovin’ homo sons ‘a’ guns” just for choosing you.
You often remark that people have to give up the hate card when it comes to your pro-regressive politics, but you yourself just can’t stop pounding on the paparazzi. Recently, another victim of your violence filed a complaint after allegedly being kicked by you. In fact you have a history of violence. In 1987 you spent 32 days in jail for beating up an extra just trying to take your picture. Where’s the love, man?
Recently, you were schmoozing with your buddy Fidel down in his prison state of Cuba. It’s a wonder you just didn’t stay there, but fret not my friend Castro’s Cuba will be brought right to you. Your wealth will be seized including that bodacious abode in Marin County, CA.
And there’ll be no more eating at fine restaurants not that you’ll be able to afford them. It won’t matter how many Academy Awards you win or how many block buster hits you make because all of it I’ll take. No instead, you will receive what is the average staple for Cubans. That would be one whole chicken per month. Why, that works out to be 12 chickens a year not that you could ever do the math.
And Sean, you seem to support every dictator around, from Iraq’s Saddam Hussein who ruthlessly tortured and murdered many to Chavez in Venezuela who shut down private media that criticized him while impoverishing his nation. You stated, “He’s much more positive for Venezuela than he is negative.”
Sean, Sweetie, you bring a whole new meaning to the term “useful idiot.” When you open your mouth and speak off the cuff, you make Bush sound like a genius.
Barbara Streisand, well Babs what can I say. You use over 10000 gallons of water each month for your lawn. Honey, we got to do something about you just to save Los Angeles let alone the planet. And your suggestion that everyone use clothespins is laughable considering you would never employ such a suggestion.
Finally, Robert Reich, I would implement your healthcare plan immediately, for it would automatically consider you too old to ever receive any care.
He also said that seniors wouldn’t get the care they might need because they were too old. Again, the audience applauded. Apparently, not many vocal codgers were in attendance. All in all, Reich gave for a pro-regressive not just an honest homily but a rather stirring speech.
Yes, inspirational not to actually agree with his idea of creating a nightmarish healthcare system that would essentially reduce every human being from a citizen to a subject. No, instead I’m inspired to write a speech of what I would want a presidential candidate to say especially to the pompous people who although rich still want to impose socialism on the rest of us…
Thank you so much for coming this afternoon. I’m so glad to see you, and I would like to be president. Let me tell you a few things about pompous people who truly peeve me because they want socialism for everyone but themselves. Although I’m a conservative through and through, I have heard the other side. Now, I agree with them, and if elected, I will diligently work to give them personally what they preach.
Michael Moore, truly I tell you. Your love affair of capitalism will end as soon as I enter the Oval Office. As president, you won’t just be wondering where your country went. You’ll also be wondering where your wealth went, dude. But, don’t worry. Your wonderful centralized government will be taking care of your money.
It’s from each according to his ability, right? We’ll be seizing all your assets. Unfortunately, your butt is another matter. Let’s face it dude, you haven’t missed a buffet since 1984, and space is especially scarce on this over populated planet. You got to slim it down, and there’s nothing like the socialist starvation diet to get you to skin and bones in no time. There’ll be no more fat farms for you, besides you won’t be able to afford them anyway.
Sean Penn, you’re so enamored with communism that you were all smiles at the 81st Academy Awards telling everyone how cool it was. Yeah, you actually cooed to the audience how they were “commie lovin’ homo sons ‘a’ guns” just for choosing you.
You often remark that people have to give up the hate card when it comes to your pro-regressive politics, but you yourself just can’t stop pounding on the paparazzi. Recently, another victim of your violence filed a complaint after allegedly being kicked by you. In fact you have a history of violence. In 1987 you spent 32 days in jail for beating up an extra just trying to take your picture. Where’s the love, man?
Recently, you were schmoozing with your buddy Fidel down in his prison state of Cuba. It’s a wonder you just didn’t stay there, but fret not my friend Castro’s Cuba will be brought right to you. Your wealth will be seized including that bodacious abode in Marin County, CA.
And there’ll be no more eating at fine restaurants not that you’ll be able to afford them. It won’t matter how many Academy Awards you win or how many block buster hits you make because all of it I’ll take. No instead, you will receive what is the average staple for Cubans. That would be one whole chicken per month. Why, that works out to be 12 chickens a year not that you could ever do the math.
And Sean, you seem to support every dictator around, from Iraq’s Saddam Hussein who ruthlessly tortured and murdered many to Chavez in Venezuela who shut down private media that criticized him while impoverishing his nation. You stated, “He’s much more positive for Venezuela than he is negative.”
Sean, Sweetie, you bring a whole new meaning to the term “useful idiot.” When you open your mouth and speak off the cuff, you make Bush sound like a genius.
Barbara Streisand, well Babs what can I say. You use over 10000 gallons of water each month for your lawn. Honey, we got to do something about you just to save Los Angeles let alone the planet. And your suggestion that everyone use clothespins is laughable considering you would never employ such a suggestion.
Finally, Robert Reich, I would implement your healthcare plan immediately, for it would automatically consider you too old to ever receive any care.
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
ObamaCare: From Debt to Death
Seniors won’t be getting a social security COLA increase next year. COLA is calculated from the inflation index, which is zero from this recession soon to be depression. Actually, real prices are skyrocketing, but because energy prices have dropped rapidly, inflation is supposedly in check.
Yet, while COLA is zero, the Medicare deducted for social security checks will still increase. So, seniors will be worse off next year paying more for the one health insurance “company” that refuses more healthcare than any other. Yeah, evil capitalists fueled by corporate greed are better to their customers than the government’s Medicare.
But, America needs that public option, which will become the only option if House Squeaker Princess Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader “Seedy Reidy” and Obama get their way. And the absolutely underhanded ways they’ve employed in selling their socialized slavery is despicable.
The CBO estimated that one bill, actually just a concept since it isn’t formal legislation, will supposedly decrease the deficit $81 billion over 10 years. Well, that’s a line of manure that could copiously supply every farm in this nation. This plan, which still won’t insure everybody when fully implemented, will cost $800 billion not over 10 years, but only four and a half since it doesn’t fully take effect until 2016.
Yes, this is how pompous politicians make something costly seem affordable like an unscrupulous used car dealer that conveniently forgets to mention that balloon payment. The true cost over 10 years would be at least double or $1.6 trillion. So, instead of a surplus, it’s $720 billion in the hole.
But wait, there’s even more shenanigans because those same politicians are promising a $400 billion cut in Medicare. Now, if seniors were mad before, just imagine what they’ll do once they discover this slash in services. Of course, politicians know seniors vote, and not enough Alzheimer’s will kick in come election time.
But the messiah will make it all better with a $250 check. “Dr. Chicago” hopes bribery is his “senior-itis” sure cure. However, if Medicare cuts don’t happen, and most likely they won’t, that would make a $1.1 trillion deficit. And that’s only one piece of so-called legislation, which doesn’t include a public option. There’s at least two more “virtual bills” in the pipeline, and it’s a sure bet that a public option will be included in one of them.
Which is why, Democrats meet in private and don’t include Republicans. Remember when Obama told America that bills would be posted on the Internet at least 5 days before a vote. Has that happened even once? That promise went to the same pigeon hole as the one where Obama promised bipartisanship.
Yes, evil Republicans want everyone to die. That’s according to Democrat Congressman Alan Grayson who thinks he’s finally figured out the GOP’s healthcare plan. Got to hand it to him, at least he admits there is a GOP plan. Most Democrats pretend Republicans are the party of “No!”
But, did Grayson find any of the 34 healthcare bills introduced by Republicans that were based on free market principals? How about tort reform? Apparently, he’s unaware of ideas like expanded Health Saving Accounts, or simply the elimination of restrictions on insurance companies offering plans across state lines. “Pro-regressives” pretend that health insurance companies abhor competition when it’s their wacky regulations preventing it.
Grayson in typical Democrat Demagoguery said that the “Republican Plan” was simply, “Don’t Get Sick! And if You Do Get Sick, Die Quickly!” Seems the dishonorable Grayson is confusing his pathetic pro-regressive party with the GOP. If there’s any party that would put in place healthcare that amounts to the imposition of death panels, it would be his.
Just listen to Robert Reich, former Clinton Labor Secretary and Obama economic advisor. In 2007, he spoke at Berkley, CA describing what he would like a presidential candidate to say about healthcare. In it, he explained that young people will just have to pay while old people should understand that their time is over and they won’t be getting any care especially expensive or innovative. So, Reich would just let them die.
Then, there’s John Holdren another one of the many un-confirmed czars. He’s the Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. He wrote the book “Ecoscience.” It stated that the elderly should be euthanized as well as other wonderful ideas like forced sterilization and government population control.
Finally, if you’re still not convinced, there’s Obama himself who said a 90-year woman’s spirit shouldn’t be taken into consideration in giving her a pacemaker. Instead he said painkillers ought to do the trick. It’s only a matter of time until Democrats say to undesirables in society that’s it’s their patriotic duty to just die, and that’ll be just sick.
Yet, while COLA is zero, the Medicare deducted for social security checks will still increase. So, seniors will be worse off next year paying more for the one health insurance “company” that refuses more healthcare than any other. Yeah, evil capitalists fueled by corporate greed are better to their customers than the government’s Medicare.
But, America needs that public option, which will become the only option if House Squeaker Princess Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader “Seedy Reidy” and Obama get their way. And the absolutely underhanded ways they’ve employed in selling their socialized slavery is despicable.
The CBO estimated that one bill, actually just a concept since it isn’t formal legislation, will supposedly decrease the deficit $81 billion over 10 years. Well, that’s a line of manure that could copiously supply every farm in this nation. This plan, which still won’t insure everybody when fully implemented, will cost $800 billion not over 10 years, but only four and a half since it doesn’t fully take effect until 2016.
Yes, this is how pompous politicians make something costly seem affordable like an unscrupulous used car dealer that conveniently forgets to mention that balloon payment. The true cost over 10 years would be at least double or $1.6 trillion. So, instead of a surplus, it’s $720 billion in the hole.
But wait, there’s even more shenanigans because those same politicians are promising a $400 billion cut in Medicare. Now, if seniors were mad before, just imagine what they’ll do once they discover this slash in services. Of course, politicians know seniors vote, and not enough Alzheimer’s will kick in come election time.
But the messiah will make it all better with a $250 check. “Dr. Chicago” hopes bribery is his “senior-itis” sure cure. However, if Medicare cuts don’t happen, and most likely they won’t, that would make a $1.1 trillion deficit. And that’s only one piece of so-called legislation, which doesn’t include a public option. There’s at least two more “virtual bills” in the pipeline, and it’s a sure bet that a public option will be included in one of them.
Which is why, Democrats meet in private and don’t include Republicans. Remember when Obama told America that bills would be posted on the Internet at least 5 days before a vote. Has that happened even once? That promise went to the same pigeon hole as the one where Obama promised bipartisanship.
Yes, evil Republicans want everyone to die. That’s according to Democrat Congressman Alan Grayson who thinks he’s finally figured out the GOP’s healthcare plan. Got to hand it to him, at least he admits there is a GOP plan. Most Democrats pretend Republicans are the party of “No!”
But, did Grayson find any of the 34 healthcare bills introduced by Republicans that were based on free market principals? How about tort reform? Apparently, he’s unaware of ideas like expanded Health Saving Accounts, or simply the elimination of restrictions on insurance companies offering plans across state lines. “Pro-regressives” pretend that health insurance companies abhor competition when it’s their wacky regulations preventing it.
Grayson in typical Democrat Demagoguery said that the “Republican Plan” was simply, “Don’t Get Sick! And if You Do Get Sick, Die Quickly!” Seems the dishonorable Grayson is confusing his pathetic pro-regressive party with the GOP. If there’s any party that would put in place healthcare that amounts to the imposition of death panels, it would be his.
Just listen to Robert Reich, former Clinton Labor Secretary and Obama economic advisor. In 2007, he spoke at Berkley, CA describing what he would like a presidential candidate to say about healthcare. In it, he explained that young people will just have to pay while old people should understand that their time is over and they won’t be getting any care especially expensive or innovative. So, Reich would just let them die.
Then, there’s John Holdren another one of the many un-confirmed czars. He’s the Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. He wrote the book “Ecoscience.” It stated that the elderly should be euthanized as well as other wonderful ideas like forced sterilization and government population control.
Finally, if you’re still not convinced, there’s Obama himself who said a 90-year woman’s spirit shouldn’t be taken into consideration in giving her a pacemaker. Instead he said painkillers ought to do the trick. It’s only a matter of time until Democrats say to undesirables in society that’s it’s their patriotic duty to just die, and that’ll be just sick.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Loony Liberalism
The title is an obvious redundancy of terms for liberals are naturally nutty, but the messiah especially seems to have no limit to his madness. Like his decision to release the enhanced interrogations methods that kept America safe. For the sake of transparency, Obama told the terrorists all the in and outs of what CIA agents could and did do.
Liberals just love to create fanciful concepts and assign value to them even when there is absolutely no evidence of that worth. Now, it’s “transparency,” which until recently was a bad thing when fighting a war.
Liberals profess with an unshakable belief that since America revealed all, our enemies will stop hating us. Liberals claim that our “torture” was a terrorist recruiting tool while never considering that releasing our techniques could incense them even more.
Actually, Al Queda instructs its recruits that if captured to lie about being brutally beaten. So, it wouldn’t matter whether interrogators used harsh language or spoke in gentle cooing sounds. Once released, they’ll still tell fanciful tales of infidel mistreatment.
Transparency won’t stop that, and the information will be used to better train terrorists to withstand questioning. Former VP “Darth Vader” Cheney claims that the redacted parts of the released documents demonstrated clearly that the enhanced techniques prevented attacks. But, Obama doesn’t want that side to be revealed.
Former CIA Director Michael Hayden along with other officials echoed Cheney’s assertion and added nothing was gained from releasing interrogation policy. It would be like FDR deciding for transparency sake to reveal to the Germans America’s plans for the invasion of Europe.
Maybe, transparency would have made Germans less likely to shoot American soldiers on the Normandy beaches. Hardly, instead the Nazis would have used the information to mount an effective counter attack rendering D-day a grand failure. In fact, General Eisenhower had two speeches. One for a successful invasion, the other in case it failed. For even Eisenhower great general that he was couldn’t guarantee victory.
Last spring Obama sent 21000 more troops to Afghanistan. He should have had a solid strategic plan for them to win there. Like when Bush sent his troop surge to Iraq.
General Petreus was implementing a new Iraq War strategy. It worked despite liberal prognostication to the contrary. Yet, Obama for the sake of transparency should reveal any strategic plan he has for Afghanistan. Maybe, the terrorists won’t become offended because more infidels are defiling a Muslim country. Hardly!
In all reality, Obama’s Afghanistan plan has already failed because he prematurely let the Afghanis alone run their elections. His hands-off policy instead resulted in widespread fraud that could eventually undermine the civilian government. Of course, what else could be expected from an ACORN acolyte?
Now, Obama doesn’t want to follow his hand picked general’s plan. General McChrystal is pleading for 40000 additional troops. Until recently, Obama has only met with McChrystal once. Kind of reminds of another national security challenged president Bill Clinton who only saw` his CIA director James Woosley twice during his tenure.
Obama did meet with McChrystal while in Denmark for a whooping 25 minutes taking valuable time from his failed Olympic bid. Whatever happened wasn’t good because they’ve been trashing each other ever since. McChrystal actually started criticizing Obama before that meeting.
Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) recently uttered something reasonable, which is rare for a Democrat. She said, “I don’t know how you put somebody in, who is as 'cracker jack' as General McChrystal who gives the president very solid recommendations and not take those recommendations if you are not going to pull out.”
However, Obama isn’t comfortable with “victory” in Afghanistan, the supposedly good war. He said it wouldn’t be “like Emperor Hirohito … signing a surrender [sic] to General MacArthur.” Incidentally, neither Hirohito nor MacArthur participated in the Japanese signing.
But, the media doesn’t care that Obama is historically challenged. It also oblivious to his indecisiveness in sending enough troops and his silly rules of engagement that are jeopardizing the lives of troops stationed there.
Don’t worry though for Obama has identified the real enemy, Fox News, the only network not worshiping him. His administration whines it’s too conservative. No doubt liberals hate conservatives while revering Islamofascists. This seems really loony. And, it is!
Unfortunately, their misplaced hatred threatens every American. Maybe, in order to get liberals to hate terrorists, “right-wingers” should recruit jihadis to run for elective office. Liberals hate conservatives precisely because sometimes they win elections, keeping liberals from their divine right to power.
But if jihadis won elections, then liberals would start loathing terrorists instead of conservatives. The ultimate objective is to get an American hating jihadi as president who would then do irreparable damage to this nation of infidels. Oh wait, that appears to have already happened. Never mind.
Liberals just love to create fanciful concepts and assign value to them even when there is absolutely no evidence of that worth. Now, it’s “transparency,” which until recently was a bad thing when fighting a war.
Liberals profess with an unshakable belief that since America revealed all, our enemies will stop hating us. Liberals claim that our “torture” was a terrorist recruiting tool while never considering that releasing our techniques could incense them even more.
Actually, Al Queda instructs its recruits that if captured to lie about being brutally beaten. So, it wouldn’t matter whether interrogators used harsh language or spoke in gentle cooing sounds. Once released, they’ll still tell fanciful tales of infidel mistreatment.
Transparency won’t stop that, and the information will be used to better train terrorists to withstand questioning. Former VP “Darth Vader” Cheney claims that the redacted parts of the released documents demonstrated clearly that the enhanced techniques prevented attacks. But, Obama doesn’t want that side to be revealed.
Former CIA Director Michael Hayden along with other officials echoed Cheney’s assertion and added nothing was gained from releasing interrogation policy. It would be like FDR deciding for transparency sake to reveal to the Germans America’s plans for the invasion of Europe.
Maybe, transparency would have made Germans less likely to shoot American soldiers on the Normandy beaches. Hardly, instead the Nazis would have used the information to mount an effective counter attack rendering D-day a grand failure. In fact, General Eisenhower had two speeches. One for a successful invasion, the other in case it failed. For even Eisenhower great general that he was couldn’t guarantee victory.
Last spring Obama sent 21000 more troops to Afghanistan. He should have had a solid strategic plan for them to win there. Like when Bush sent his troop surge to Iraq.
General Petreus was implementing a new Iraq War strategy. It worked despite liberal prognostication to the contrary. Yet, Obama for the sake of transparency should reveal any strategic plan he has for Afghanistan. Maybe, the terrorists won’t become offended because more infidels are defiling a Muslim country. Hardly!
In all reality, Obama’s Afghanistan plan has already failed because he prematurely let the Afghanis alone run their elections. His hands-off policy instead resulted in widespread fraud that could eventually undermine the civilian government. Of course, what else could be expected from an ACORN acolyte?
Now, Obama doesn’t want to follow his hand picked general’s plan. General McChrystal is pleading for 40000 additional troops. Until recently, Obama has only met with McChrystal once. Kind of reminds of another national security challenged president Bill Clinton who only saw` his CIA director James Woosley twice during his tenure.
Obama did meet with McChrystal while in Denmark for a whooping 25 minutes taking valuable time from his failed Olympic bid. Whatever happened wasn’t good because they’ve been trashing each other ever since. McChrystal actually started criticizing Obama before that meeting.
Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) recently uttered something reasonable, which is rare for a Democrat. She said, “I don’t know how you put somebody in, who is as 'cracker jack' as General McChrystal who gives the president very solid recommendations and not take those recommendations if you are not going to pull out.”
However, Obama isn’t comfortable with “victory” in Afghanistan, the supposedly good war. He said it wouldn’t be “like Emperor Hirohito … signing a surrender [sic] to General MacArthur.” Incidentally, neither Hirohito nor MacArthur participated in the Japanese signing.
But, the media doesn’t care that Obama is historically challenged. It also oblivious to his indecisiveness in sending enough troops and his silly rules of engagement that are jeopardizing the lives of troops stationed there.
Don’t worry though for Obama has identified the real enemy, Fox News, the only network not worshiping him. His administration whines it’s too conservative. No doubt liberals hate conservatives while revering Islamofascists. This seems really loony. And, it is!
Unfortunately, their misplaced hatred threatens every American. Maybe, in order to get liberals to hate terrorists, “right-wingers” should recruit jihadis to run for elective office. Liberals hate conservatives precisely because sometimes they win elections, keeping liberals from their divine right to power.
But if jihadis won elections, then liberals would start loathing terrorists instead of conservatives. The ultimate objective is to get an American hating jihadi as president who would then do irreparable damage to this nation of infidels. Oh wait, that appears to have already happened. Never mind.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Going Gruesomely Green
There’s this oil heat radio ad where two extreme green neighbors are talking tit for tat on who’s saving the planet better. Whether it’s driving a hybrid verses not commuting at all to organic gardening verses solar powered composters, “Mirror, mirror on the wall, who’s the greenest of them all.” The ending is especially interesting. Each neighbor, after saying their somewhat friendly goodbyes, calls each other freak and lunatic under their ultra-low CO2 emissions breath.
While this ad uses freaks to illuminate the public of oil heat’s eco-friendliness, on the CBS Morning Show co-host Harry Smith recently interviewed two real freaks who chose to live without electricity and toilet paper for one year. What is it with eco-whackos and their obsession against toilet paper?
For toilet paper is the greatest invention of all time. In fact, the phrase the best thing “since sliced bread” should be “since 3-ply” instead. Toilet paper is such a great leap for mankind, actually a great clean behind for mankind, it was featured on the History channel’s program, “Modern Marvels.”
But, Colin and Michelle Beavan, possible ancestral relatives to Beavis and Butthead, gave up these comforts. So eco-whacked is this couple that Smith just had to gush, “This is an amazing saga....when the lights were switched back on, Colin and Michelle clearly saw a year that meant so much more than living without toilet paper.” Also, the cockroaches were seen scrambling in all directions.
When asked what their inspiration was, they said, “Concern for the planet. I mean, we were reading so much about global warming happening and we were just frustrated because what can any one person do? So we thought we’d try to do what we could.”
Michelle added, “I had just seen the movie An Inconvenient Truth.” How many others have been ruined by a movie where an English court ruled there are at least nine egregious errors? But, a better question would be, “Should Al Gore be sued if this couple ever dies of an e-coli infection?”
Near the end of the interview, Colin, again citing the global warming hysteria, said “And we discovered that, you know, there is a climate emergency happening and it is possible for us as citizens to actually take care.” Where then, Smith readily agreed and added, “You just have to get 300 million people to do it.”
Now, if a conservative decided to give up using electricity and toilet paper, he would choose only for himself this loony lifestyle. But, liberals aren’t happy unless everyone gives up these comforts as well. Of course, if the truth be told, no conservative would ever surrender his toilet paper.
So, what did the Beavan’s use instead of toilet paper? Maybe, their hands! While concluding the segment, Smith made reference to the lack of toilet paper: “Okay, and the last question, is the answer newspaper?” But, Colin instead dodged the potentially odorous question and replied, “What we want to talk about here is that we have a big emergency.”
Speaking of which, a big emergency is when after doing one’s business, the discovery is made that there’s nothing left on the roll.
And, the Beavan’s even believe in eating only fresh unpackaged food. Where then Smith claimed, “The cost of what the wheat is in a box of cereal that costs $4? It’s a couple of pennies, you know, versus all of this stuff that’s around it.” That’s especially hard to swallow. Farmers couldn’t stay in business if they were getting so little for their produce.
So, what’s next for this progressive, actually if the truth be known, pro-regressive partnership? Living in a cave, going homeless. It seams urban outdoorsmen could be way ahead of their time. These original “No Impact Men” have the ultimate green lifestyle.
But, a better idea would be instead of apartment buildings or skyscrapers level them all and build “crust-scrapers,” buildings that go down, not up. This would eliminate urban heat islands and building enhanced wind effect, and those bad hair days that it causes.
Crust-scrapers would also be natural bomb shelters in the case of a nuclear attack. With Obama, the likelihood of which only increases as he ineptly deals with nuclear proliferation which he’ll be pursuing even more after getting his Nobel Appeasement Prize.
Finally, crust-scrapers would be greener than buildings certified by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). These regulations developed by the US Green Building Council (USGBC) are on the books in 45 states and more than 100 cities. LEED was supposed to create more energy efficient buildings.
But according to Henry Gifford in a study commissioned by USGBC, LEED certified buildings actually use more energy. Which is not surprising, so often in this eco-debate being green not only isn’t clean, it costs “more green.”
While this ad uses freaks to illuminate the public of oil heat’s eco-friendliness, on the CBS Morning Show co-host Harry Smith recently interviewed two real freaks who chose to live without electricity and toilet paper for one year. What is it with eco-whackos and their obsession against toilet paper?
For toilet paper is the greatest invention of all time. In fact, the phrase the best thing “since sliced bread” should be “since 3-ply” instead. Toilet paper is such a great leap for mankind, actually a great clean behind for mankind, it was featured on the History channel’s program, “Modern Marvels.”
But, Colin and Michelle Beavan, possible ancestral relatives to Beavis and Butthead, gave up these comforts. So eco-whacked is this couple that Smith just had to gush, “This is an amazing saga....when the lights were switched back on, Colin and Michelle clearly saw a year that meant so much more than living without toilet paper.” Also, the cockroaches were seen scrambling in all directions.
When asked what their inspiration was, they said, “Concern for the planet. I mean, we were reading so much about global warming happening and we were just frustrated because what can any one person do? So we thought we’d try to do what we could.”
Michelle added, “I had just seen the movie An Inconvenient Truth.” How many others have been ruined by a movie where an English court ruled there are at least nine egregious errors? But, a better question would be, “Should Al Gore be sued if this couple ever dies of an e-coli infection?”
Near the end of the interview, Colin, again citing the global warming hysteria, said “And we discovered that, you know, there is a climate emergency happening and it is possible for us as citizens to actually take care.” Where then, Smith readily agreed and added, “You just have to get 300 million people to do it.”
Now, if a conservative decided to give up using electricity and toilet paper, he would choose only for himself this loony lifestyle. But, liberals aren’t happy unless everyone gives up these comforts as well. Of course, if the truth be told, no conservative would ever surrender his toilet paper.
So, what did the Beavan’s use instead of toilet paper? Maybe, their hands! While concluding the segment, Smith made reference to the lack of toilet paper: “Okay, and the last question, is the answer newspaper?” But, Colin instead dodged the potentially odorous question and replied, “What we want to talk about here is that we have a big emergency.”
Speaking of which, a big emergency is when after doing one’s business, the discovery is made that there’s nothing left on the roll.
And, the Beavan’s even believe in eating only fresh unpackaged food. Where then Smith claimed, “The cost of what the wheat is in a box of cereal that costs $4? It’s a couple of pennies, you know, versus all of this stuff that’s around it.” That’s especially hard to swallow. Farmers couldn’t stay in business if they were getting so little for their produce.
So, what’s next for this progressive, actually if the truth be known, pro-regressive partnership? Living in a cave, going homeless. It seams urban outdoorsmen could be way ahead of their time. These original “No Impact Men” have the ultimate green lifestyle.
But, a better idea would be instead of apartment buildings or skyscrapers level them all and build “crust-scrapers,” buildings that go down, not up. This would eliminate urban heat islands and building enhanced wind effect, and those bad hair days that it causes.
Crust-scrapers would also be natural bomb shelters in the case of a nuclear attack. With Obama, the likelihood of which only increases as he ineptly deals with nuclear proliferation which he’ll be pursuing even more after getting his Nobel Appeasement Prize.
Finally, crust-scrapers would be greener than buildings certified by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). These regulations developed by the US Green Building Council (USGBC) are on the books in 45 states and more than 100 cities. LEED was supposed to create more energy efficient buildings.
But according to Henry Gifford in a study commissioned by USGBC, LEED certified buildings actually use more energy. Which is not surprising, so often in this eco-debate being green not only isn’t clean, it costs “more green.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
